Duns Scot vs Thomas d’Aquin. Le moment québécois d’un conflit multi-séculaire
Gingras, Y. (2009). Duns Scot vs Thomas d’Aquin. Le moment québécois d’un conflit multi-séculaire. Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique française, 62(3-4), 377-406.
Gingras, Y. (2009). Duns Scot vs Thomas d’Aquin. Le moment québécois d’un conflit multi-séculaire. Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique française, 62(3-4), 377-406.
Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Hajjem, C., R. Hilf, E. (2008). The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access : An Update. Serial Review. 34(1), 36-40.
Gingras, Y., Larivière, V., Macaluso, B. et Robitaille, J.-P. (2008). The effects of aging of scientists on their publication and citation patterns. PLoS ONE, 3(12).
Gingras, Y. (2008). Du mauvais usage de faux indicateurs. Revue d’histoire moderne & contemporaine, 55-4bis(5), 67-79.
Lebeau, L.-M., Laframboise, M.-C., Larivière, V. et Gingras, Y. (2008). The effect of university-industry collaboration on the scientific impact of publications : the Canadian case (1980-2005). Research Evaluation, 17(3), 227-232.
Larivière, V., Archambault, É. et Gingras, Y. (2008). Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: from exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 288-296.
Gingras, Y. et Gosselin, P.-M. (2008). The Emergence and Evolution of the Expression “Conflict of Interests” in Science: A Historical Overview, 1880–2006. Sci Eng Ethics, 14, 337–343.
Lamy, J. et Gingras, Y. (2008). Between Astronomical Observatories and Universities in nineteenth-century France. History of Universities, 23(1), 75-114).
Gingras, Y. (2008). The Collective Construction of Scientific Memory: The Einstein-Poincaré Connection and its Discontents, 1905–2005. History of Science, 46(1), 75–114.
Référence Gingras, Y. (2007). « Please, Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood » : The Role of Argumentation in a Sociology of Academic. Social Epistemology, 21(4), 369-389. Résumé Academic debates are so frequent and omnipresent in most disciplines, particularly the social sciences and humanities, it seems obvious that disagreements are bound to occur. The aim of this paper is […]