<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Description<\/strong> : Le cours vise \u00e0 comprendre le d\u00e9veloppement historique des disciplines et la construction des savoirs scientifiques. Son contenu porte sur les th\u00e8mes suivants: l’analyse des modes de formation des connaissances scientifiques et technologiques depuis la r\u00e9volution scientifique, les relations entre les cadres institutionnels et les connaissances scientifiques et technologiques ainsi que l’analyse sociohistorique des transformations des disciplines et des champs de connaissances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1- Jean-Louis Fabiani, \u00ab \u00c0 quoi sert la notion de discipline ?<\/a> \u00bb, Enqu\u00eate, no 5, 2006, p. 11-34<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2- Andrew Abbott, \u00ab Le chaos des disciplines<\/a> \u00bb, Enqu\u00eate<\/em>, no 5, 2006, p. 35-67.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3- Roy Porter, \u00abThe Scientific Revolution and the Universities<\/a>\u00bb, in A History of the University in Europe<\/em>, vol. II, H.. de Ridder-Symoens (ed.), Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996, pp. 531-564.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4- Steven Turner, \u00abThe Growth of Professional Research in Prussia, 1818-848 — Causes and Context<\/a>\u00bb,\u00a0Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences<\/em>, vol. 3, 1971, pp. 137-182. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5 -Robert K. Merton, Harriet Zuckerman, \u00abInstititionalized Patterns of Evaluation in Science<\/a>\u00bb, in Robert K. Merton, The Sociology of Science<\/em>, Chicago University Press, 1973, pp. 460-496.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6- Margaret F. Stieg,\u00a0Origins and Development of Scholarly Historical Periodicals<\/a>, Alabama, University of Alabama Press, 1986, chapitre 3, pp. 39-81.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7- Mario Biagioli, \u00abFrom Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review<\/a>\u00bb, Emergences<\/em>, vol. 12, no 1 (2002), pp. 11-45. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8- Doris S. Goldstein, \u00abThe Professionalization of History in Britain in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries<\/a>\u00bb, Storia della Storiografia<\/em>, no 3, 1982, pp. 3-26. <\/p>\n\n\n\n 9- Reba Soffer, \u00abWhy Do disciplines fail? The strange case of British Sociology<\/a>\u00bb, English Historical Review<\/em>, vol. 97, no 385 (1982), pp. 767-802. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 10- Karl Hufbauer, \u00abSocial Support for Chemistry in Germany during the 18th Century : How and Why Did It changed?<\/a>\u00bb,\u00a0Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences<\/em>, vol. 3, 1971, pp.205-231.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 11- J. B. Morrell, \u00abThe Chemists Breeders : The Reserch Schools of Liebig and Thomas Thomson<\/a>, Ambix<\/em>, vol. 19, March 1972, pp. 1-49. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 12- Jack Morrell, \u00abW. H. Perkin, Jr., at Manchester and Oxford: From Irwell to Isis<\/a>\u00bb Osiris<\/em>, vol. 8, 1993pp.104-126. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 13- Russell Moseley, \u00abTadpoles and Frogs. Some aspects of the Professionalization of British Physcis<\/a>\u00bb, Social Studies of Science<\/em>, vol. 7, no 4 (Nov., 1977), pp. 423-446. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 14- R.W. Home and Masao Watanabe, \u00abPhysics in Australia and Japan to 1914 : A Comparison<\/a>\u00bb, Annals of Science<\/em>, vol. 44, 1987, pp. 215-235. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 15- R.W. Home and Masao Watanabe, \u00abForming New Physics Communities : Australia and Japan, 1914-1950<\/a>\u00bb, Annals of Science<\/em>, vol. 47, 1990, pp. 317-345. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 16- Gernot B\u00f6hme, Wolfgang Van Den Daele, and Wolfgang Krohn, \u00abFinalization in science<\/a>\u00bb, Social Science Information<\/em>, vol. 15, nos 2-3 (1976) pp. 307-330. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 17- Frank R. Pfetsch, \u00abThe ‘Finalization’ Debate in Germany: Some Comments and Explanations<\/a>\u00bb, Social Studies of Science<\/em>, vol. 9, no 1 (1979) pp. 115-124. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 18- William Leeming, \u00abRevisiting Finalization<\/a>\u00bb, Social Science Information<\/em>, vol. 36, no 3 (1997) pp. 387-410.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 19- Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L., \u00abThe dynamics of innovation: from national systems and \u2018Mode 2\u2019 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations<\/a>\u00bb, Research Policy<\/em>, vol. 29 (2000) pp. 109-123. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 20- Weingart, Peter, \u00abFrom Finalization to Mode 2: Old Wine in New Bottles?<\/a>\u00bb, Social Science Information<\/em>, vol. 36, no 4 (1997) pp. 591\u2013613. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 21- Paul Jeffrey , \u00abSmoothing the Waters : Observations on the Process of Cross-Disciplinary Research Collaboration<\/a>\u00bb, Social Studies of Science<\/em>, vol. 33, no 4 (2003) pp. 539-562. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 22- Larivi\u00e8re, Vincent et Yves Gingras. \u00abOn the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact<\/a>\u00bb. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology<\/em>, vol. 61, no 1 (January 2010) pp.126-131. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 23- Sheila Slaughter and Larry L. Leslie,\u00a0Academic Capitalism, Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University<\/em><\/a>, Johns Hopkins Univerrsity Press, 1997, Chapter 1, pp. 1-22.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 24- Amy Scott Metcalfe, \u00abRevisiting Academic Capitalism in Canada: No Longer the Exception<\/a>\u00bb, The Journal of Higher Education<\/em>, vol. 81, no 4 (July\/August 2010) pp. 489-514. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 25- Mike Almeida, \u00abComment se rendre utile : Les centres de recherche universitaires en sciences sociales au Canada<\/a>\u00bb, Scientia Canadensis<\/em>, vol. 30, no 2 (2007) pp. 97-122. E-copie<\/p>\n\n\n\n 26- Etzkowitz, H., \u00abResearch groups as \u2018quasi-firms\u2019: the invention of the entrepreneurial university<\/a>\u00bb, Research Policy<\/em>, vol. 32 no 1 (2003) pp. 109\u2013121. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 27- David B. Resnick, \u00abFinancial Interests and the Norms of Science<\/a>\u00bb, in Hans Radder (dir.), The Commodification of Academic Research<\/em>, Pittsburgh University Press, 2010, pp. 65-89. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 28- Markus Perkmann and Kathryn Walsh, \u00abThe two faces of collaboration: impacts of university-industry relations on public research<\/a>\u00bb, Industrial and Corporate Change<\/em>, vol. 18, no 6 (2009) pp. 1033\u20131065. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 29- Carlos Alberto Tores et Robert A. Rhoades, \u00abGlobalization in Higher Education in the Americas<\/a>\u00bb, in The University, State and Market. The Political Economy of Globalization in the Americas<\/em>, edited by Robert A. Rhoads and Carlos Alberto Torres, Stanford University Press, 2006, pp. 3-38. E-copie.<\/p>\n\n\n\nCours 1 : Qu\u2019est-ce qu\u2019une discipline scientifique ?<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 2 : L\u2019origine de la recherche universitaire <\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 3 : L\u2019\u00e9valuation par les pairs<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 4 : Les disciplines des sciences sociales<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 5 : L\u2019\u00e9mergence des disciplines<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 6 : L\u2019institutionnalisation de la physique<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 7 : La th\u00e8se de la finalisation de la recherche<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 8 : Les nouveaux modes de production du savoir<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 9 : Les relations entre les disciplines<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 10 : Un capitalisme acad\u00e9mique?<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 11 : Les relations universit\u00e9-industrie<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cours 12 : La globalisation de la recherche<\/h4>\n\n\n\n